The position, with full unseen pool and whatnot, is
HERE., including 4 unknown tiles from current player's rackIt's a relatively straight-forward one at first blush. There are exactly seven tiles left in the bag, with both blanks unseen, and I trail 299 to 323. I strongly suspect, due to an obvious fish the previous play, that my opponent holds at least one, and possibly both blanks, and considering the unseen pool unseen tiles (AANNNOORRSUW??), a bingo, while not automatic, seemed probable. My rack is CEIKRSV. This rack yields one eight, which I did find relatively easily. It also plays at 14A.
Pete: Turn 12
| | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |
| 1 | L1 | A1 | C3 | E1 | | | P3 | U1 | N1 | T1 | | | | | |
| 2 | | | | F4 | A1 | Z10 | E1 | | | O1 | N1 | | | | |
| 3 | | Y4 | E1 | T1 | I1 | | | Q10 | | T1 | I1 | | O1 | E1 | |
| 4 | V4 | A1 | T1 | | | | P3 | I1 | N1 | A1 | S1 | T1 | E1 | R1 | S1 |
| 5 | I1 | | | W4 | A1 | D2 | | | | L1 | I1 | | | | L1 |
| 6 | O1 | H4 | | | B3 | I1 | B3 | | | E1 | | | | | Y4 |
| 7 | L1 | I1 | | | | F4 | A1 | M3 | E1 | D2 | | | | | E1 |
| 8 | E1 | | | | | | M3 | I1 | X8 | | | | | | R1 |
| 9 | T1 | | | | | | | G2 | | | | | | | |
| 10 | | | | | | J8 | A1 | G2 | E1 | R1 | | | | | |
| 11 | | | | D2 | U1 | O1 | | | | | | | | | |
| 12 | H4 | U1 | G2 | E1 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 | O1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 14 | O1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 15 | D2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Chris Sheppard | unknown | 323 |
| → | Pete | CEIKRSV | 299 |
My logic went as follows: If I bingo, and he has a bingo, I lose. and with any small fishing play, I'm drawing at a sub-optimal leave for the necessary bingo. An intermediate play that scores probably blocks lines I may need to respond, and would probably get outrun by an out in two or three unless I draw a blank. I decided to exchange KV, figuring that CEIRS +2 had a lot of potential on the wide open board, and sticking him with the V and the K might provide the points I'd need.
I just don't know if my logic was totally on the mark. Quackle, after 1019 iterations, gives the following:
F10 (JO)CK 17 48.87%
K10 SICK 34 48.50%
exch KV 0 47.12%
14A (O)VERSICK 88 46.97%
I don't know if Quackle is wrong because it doesn't infer that a blank seems less likely to come out of bag than pure probability would dictate, or am I wrong to overestimate the chances that my opponent holds that blank? I think the timing of the plays leads me towards the exchange being better than JOCK, as you're giving your opponent seven tiles if he bingoes, and if he doesn't, throwing a couple of clunky ones for him to work with. SICK seems way too easy to outrun...
I think I did the right thing, I'm just not sure I fully understand why... I open it to the floor for discussion and insults of the author.
Tags: position, scrabble
Current Location: home
Current Mood:
confused